Installing Mac OS-X on a Dell
[This post updated 6-7-05 with additional information and citations]
Yes, it's true. Sometime in 2007, you will likely be able to install OS-X 10.5 on your crappy-ass Dell.
Apple is losing the big competitive difference they once had. Instead, they're becoming one of the pack. Apple's sales may go up, but what made us love Apple will go down precipitously .And ultimately, that could hurt Apple. The "Mac" as you know it will be no more.
You thought my opening line was a scare tactic, but just wait until they hack OS-X to run on any WinTel machine. Dells could, in theory, be running OS-X. Fucking wonderful. You can keep it.
I read this somewhere in the past week on-line, but I don't remember where or I'd cite the reference: Apple lost approximately 40% of their developers went they went from the 68000 platform to the PowerPC. They lost nearly 60% of their developers when they went from OS-9 to OS-X. So, out of 1,000** developers they lost 400 (40% of 1000) in the first big change leaving 600. Of the remaining 600 they lost 360 (60% of 600). That leaves 240 out of every 1000, or just 24% -- that's a 76% defection rate. Who, exactly, is going to WRITE software for OS-X 10.5*?
Another statistic: From the front page of the 6-7-05 Miami Herald business section: in the 1980s, Apple had just over 10% of the computer market share. When Apple switched to the PowerPC from the 68000, they dropped to 5% market share. That's a 50% drop in market share. When Apple switched from OS-9 to OS-X they dropped to 3% market share. A drop of 40% more. The Apple faithful stand behind Apple, but the real world runs away.
So guess what the trend is telling us? Apple and their lemming-like users are living in a fantasy world. I used to be one of this group, but as of today, I am not.
Apple is slowly killing itself. It will cease to be a computer maker one day -- probably sooner than later. It's going to be the iPod company. That's all great except that Apple Music is likely to win its lawsuit against Apple Computer. For those keeping tabs, Apple Computer in the 1980s settled out of court with Apple Music enjoining them from making computing devices with music capability (it started with the Ensoniq chip in the Apple IIgs) in perpetuity. Pretty much everyone who has read the actual agreement agrees: Apple Computer has no case. If they can't settle, Apple Computer is going to lose and lose in a huge way which will result in the closure of the company.
I fail to see why Apple jumped on the WinTel chipset when they did everything in their power to destroy clones. Now, they've virtually guaranteed the Return of the Clones -- a process which they will not be able to reverse this time. They've forsaken proprietary architecture for popular architecture. It will drive down prices, but with it will go legendary quality. The nice things about Macs is they don't crash. Welcome to the world of PCs where mediocrity is an acceptable state of being.
Worse, you can bet your sweet little ass, you will see a version on Windows for your Mac/WinTel machine. And the only way you can run future version of Microsoft Office for the "Mac" will be on that version of Windows.
A few of my Mac friends seem to think this is a good idea, but I'm assuming they were heavily medicated because I can't come up with any sane, rational reason why this would be a good thing. When Apple releases their last PowerPC system, buy one. It's going to be the last real Macintosh you ever own.
-- E
* or whatever you're going to call it
** My percentages are basically accurate, although I don't know the exact number of developers they started with -- just replace the number 1000 with the correct number ....
Labels: Apple, Computers, Dell, Macintosh, Technology
Stumble It!



9 Comments:
:: sobbing ::
I'm going to slit my wrists now. :-<
Your statistics suck.
Apparently, after losing 40% of their workforce, Apple was perfectly content to not hire any more people. And after losing 60% the second time, they again felt they didn't need to hire more people. I can understand this; I mean, who'd want to work for Apple? It's not like there are various BSD/Linux geeks with a secret Jones for Apple that would join up to work on OS X. And there certainly aren't any disaffected Windows hackers with BSD/Linxu experience who'd want to try something with a company they consider possibly less evil, and probably much cooler, than Microsoft. Nah, this would never happen.
Regarding market share: You talk about clones, and yet ignore the fact that proliferation of cheap PC clones makes it easy for people on a budget (say, me) to get a computer when said people could not afford an Apple? The people who could afford Apples or were Apple cultists continued to buy Apples, it's just that more people suddenly had access to PCs than before. Ergo, market share drop. Even more is the fact that Macs have not gotten any cheaper until the recent Mac Mini, so if you wanted a bargain Mac, you had to buy it used and far behind what PC technology could get you for much less. Hell, you can build your own PC (which I've done) for the best value, something which can't be done with the Mac.
Remember, computers aren't objects d'art to most people. They're appliances. You try to get the cheapest one that can do everything you need it to. If you are an enthusiast of some kind, you might entertain the idea of shelling out more cash for a prettier and theoretically more stable Apple computer (my mom's Apples crash less than my dad's PCs, but it always seems to be more catastrophic and much more difficult to fix yourself).
I'm not attacking or defending Apple's decision regarding Mactel. I, uh, seem to be attacking *you*. Actually, I'm attacking your statistics. You can make anything look good and/or bad given the right numbers.
I'm not sure I understand comments about losing their workforce. I think their total number of employees has increased. You must mean "Developers" which are independent companies (Adobe, Microsloth, etc) who write software for Apple or make Hardware (HP printers, Epson Scanners, etc). You just missed that entirely. I won't attack you or even make fun of you for failing to read and understand what I wrote. After all, being a PC dude, you must not know any better :D
Actually, you CAN build a Mac but it's a daunting task for most people. I will concede that point to you anyway. PCs are and will continue to be cheaper than MACs. It's only the fact Apple sets their prices where they are that make them so expensive. Apple COULD sell them at close to PC prices but elects (stupidly) not to.
As for crashing, I have a PC at work. It crashes more in one month than my Mac does all year. Most of my crashes are relatively harmless. Worst case, I reboot. (I exclude Operating Systems Upgrades which are just as buggy as MicroSoft's).
So have a day and keep using your PC. I'm sure one day I'll join you.
Ah. I saw "their developers" and I thought you meant their internal developers, rather than third-party developers. That makes much more sense, then. It also is easily demonstrated in the downward spiral of game developers for Macs.
My Linux PC has crashed due to bad hardware (i.e., when the CPU fan breaks after 7 years, and you get a heatwave, it might be good to replace it), but it lets me recycle old hardware and run interesting things, like servers.
Well that's one thing the Mac will benefit from. More games on the MacInTel platform. Lots more. And just like their PC brethren, 80% will suck. :)
Steve jobs stole the entire concept of the operating system from Bill Gates, so I guess it's just a case of what goes around comes around.
http://tinyurl.com/cvhmx <-- news article
http://tinyurl.com/833em <-- how to do it yourself
Wow. That didn't take long. TOLD YOU SO.
Wow, talk about a slew of inaccurate predictions. Better trade that crystal ball of yours in for one that works.
Ah well. Nobody is perfect.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home