Wow, OJ really didn't do it.
Well, we'll never know for sure. But here's the case:
First, the Dallas Observer, has an article on 4-12-01 explaining some troubling inconsistencies with the case. They've checked all the facts but have not made a formal accusation. Then, over at NNDB they've got a few more details which you should also read.
It make sense that Jason Simpson did it, and the only reason OJ didn't pursue the real killer is that it was his son. It's pretty convincing stuff, especially when you read the 'facts' that aren't all facts. I can't believe I think OJ might be innocent. Ugh.
Labels: OJ Simpson
posted by Rev. CMOT TMPV @ 5/14/2006 06:52:00 PM (permalink)
Stumble It!
2 Comments:
That's really screwed up. Interesting that this wasn't picked up by the media; it seems that keeping OJ as the villain serves their interests better. Assuming, of course, that it was his son that did it, and that he was forced to protect his son. How credible is the PI from the article?
Don't know if anyone will see this, but, I think you're wrong. There is a real killer directly involved in this case. He testified. And he's even more involved than you know. Just ask his girl friend (or was).
Then you'll know everything. Want to know more? Call me Animal Cracker.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home