The Quagmire

       (Go to: Quagmire Blog's Main Page)

The Quagmire describes my mind -- full of random bits of things all stuck together -- these things may include, but are not limited to: music, TV, movies, writing, reading, theatre, politics, religion, whatever.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

VideoGate: Belichick's Cheating Ruins NFL Credibility

I'll skip the discussion of the travails of the actual incident in questions. It's pretty much blatant and obvious. I'm going to move right on to my opinions of the NFL's response. I think it's a total sham. What a freaking crock of excrement.

First and foremost Belichick, doesn't have even have to pay his fine because the Patriots are doing it for him.

Secondly, Belichick earns $4.2 million per year so even if he HAD to pay it, it's about 12% of his salary. In that regard, it's pretty minor. Sure, nobody wants to lose 12% of their salary, but I'd see many people giving up 12% for my Vince Lombardi trophy. This fine is insulting to the fans and the other teams.

Thirdly, Belichick has been accused of this in the past and has been warned in the past. He went and did it anyway. That's a pre-meditated offence and deserves the harshest punishment for him and his team. I don't believe for one second that the team wasn't aware of his actions. I think it's fantastic they got busted. I hope it serves as a distraction to their entire team. (I feel bad for their fans and ex-players because now their entire legacy under Belichick is now tarnished and in question.)

Fourth, the annual revenue of the New England Patriots is $250,000,000 (on an estimated worth of $1.1 billion dollars) -- yes about $250 million dollars per year. So a $250,000 fine is 0.1% of their annual revenue. Yes ZERO POINT ONE PERCENT of annual revenue is the amount of their fine. That's probably a day at the concession stands at best, or maybe the take for parking. It's a disgrace.

Fifth, The draft picks are a minor detail. They should be, at minimum, barred from the playoffs for a year or three and possibly have their last title stripped from them too. Belichick should be suspended for a year or two and not be allowed to coach or attend any games. The league needs to make a huge statement that it will not tolerate this sort of behaviour. This is far worse than what has been done by the players and it creates a double standard.

I'd cheat every game if I were disposed to be a cheater. What the NFL has done is create a situation where it pays to cheat. It's absurdly disgraceful. They need to do something FAR more severe but they won't. For $250k per game, or a few million dollars a year, you can cheat at every single game. Even the team with the lowest revenue rakes in over $167,000,000 per year and is worth 3/4 of a billion dollars.

I think cheating destroys the integrity, honesty, and character of a sport. It's inexcusable and must be discouraged in a meaningful way.

(Belicheck -- to catch the people who can't spell it right)

Labels: , , , ,




1 Comments:

At 17 September, 2007 21:11, Blogger Jose said...

Taking your text out of sequence, so bear with me:

I think cheating destroys the integrity, honesty, and character of a sport. It's inexcusable and must be discouraged in a meaningful way.

I agree with you about cheating, but I don't feel like coaches like Belichick are the problem the NFL faces. Steroids, my friend. Steroids. Shawn Merriman gets a four game suspension for using steroids? That's it? Same for Rodney Harrison? And there are countless others.

I'd cheat every game if I were disposed to be a cheater. What the NFL has done is create a situation where it pays to cheat. It's absurdly disgraceful.

I don't think these particular actions by Belichick, although obviously against the rules, are such a threat to the game.

From various articles I've seen online, coaches have been pulling this stuff since at least the fifties. But more importantly, as other people, also online, have mentioned, NFL films + the networks have so much video coverage that stunts like Belichick's are not bound to last long uncaught. Especially if it's a team like New England, where everyone outside New England despises them, and where there is a long history of disgruntled coaches and players. As a writer online put it, it took until 2007 for someone to notice and do something about it? Either someone did, and the league did not care, or it's not particularly pervasive (unlike the steroids problem).

Belichick broke the rules, was caught, and was fined. New England lost a first round pick. You argue that this is inadequate. I don't know myself, but I believe that steroids have been used throughout the league, for decades, with every team, player, and commissioner turning a blind eye. And I believe the benefits, the actual in-game impact, of steroids far outweigh any advantage Belichick may have gained by videotaping his opponents. Even if the coaches know what's coming (and the quarterback headset gets switched off with 10 seconds left on the play clock), the players have to be fundamentally sound, healthy, and able to execute, something the healing powers (and strengthening powers) of steroids and HGH can aid, but video tape cannot.

Some of my sources:
http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/09/17/players_hand_it_to_embattled_coach/?page=full
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/15/AR2007091501560_pf.html
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/bostonblog

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


Please note, anonymous comments are generally rejected. If you're afraid to put your name on your comments, don't expect to see them here.
This blog was started 24 October 2004 and the template last updated 21 April 2008.
©2004-2008, Eric A. Seiden. All Rights Reserved.
eXTReMe Tracker